BIG AIPAC MONEY RULES CAPITOL HILL
Jamaal Bowman lost to AIPAC candidate in the most expensive House race in U.S. history
It is essential to understand that being anti-war in the U.S. means you are anti-Israel, anti-AIPAC, anti-BIG MONEY in U.S. elections.
Being anti-war and opposing U.S. proxy wars means BIG AIPAC MONEY is coming after you.
Jamaal Bowman’s defeat at the hands of AIPAC in the most expensive House race in US history is something anti-Palestinian Democrats are celebrating, as Zionist Democrats rejoice the brute power of AIPAC BIG MONEY to defeat anti-war candidates.
It is apparent that Democrats and Republicans will never, ever get BIG MONEY OUT OF US ELECTIONS.
We The People live under BIG MONEY, SPECIAL INTEREST, CORPORATE RULE.
The ONLY WAY we will ever end special interest, AIPAC, corporate rule of America and our government is by forming a new political party and running party candidates to defeat and eventually overcome the bi-partisan crimewave in Washington known as Democrats and Republicans.
It is the ULTIMATE long term political project that is absolutely necessary to end BIG MONEY RULE of US elections, politics and government.
BIG MONEY is what keeps the US-backed Occupation of the Palestinian territories in place. Democrats and Republicans will never stop funding, arming Israel’s war and genocide of the Palestinian people.
I firmly believe that THE OCCUPATION will not end until a new party gains a foothold in Congress and a new party President in the White House.
A new party President could actually use a President’s powers to END THE OCCUPATION and END AIPAC CONTROL OF CONGRESS.
How? We The People need a President who will enforce federal law on an illegal foreign lobby group making massive illegal campaign contributions in U.S. elections.
But how? A President is tasked with a constitutional duty to protect America from all enemies - foreign and domestic. When a President sees an illegal foreign lobby group interfering in US elections, the President has a legal and constitutional right to appoint a U.S. Attorney General and FBI Director who will enforce federal law on AIPAC; in particular, the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
The Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) prohibits any foreign entity from making political campaign contributions in US elections and does require said foreign agents to register with the federal government as a foreign agent - something President Kennedy and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy tried to do during the Kennedy administration, but was derailed on November 22, 1963.
To this day AIPAC refuses to register as a foreign lobby group that they are and have been since Nov. 22, 1963.
The U.S. media is so favorable to AIPAC and the pro-war lobby, the US media either completely ignores anti-war progressives or denigrates anti-war Americans as much as they can.
Simply put, if We The People do not form a new party and run progressive candidates for office TO REPLACE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS, your kids will be indoctrinated at their schools to support US WAR FOR ISRAEL INDEFINITELY, NO MATTER HOW MANY MUSLIMS ISRAEL KILLS WITH AMERICAN BOMBS.
At the rate we’re going, your kids and especially your grandkids will know nothing about the true history of the Palestinian people and this thing called the “State of Israel.”
At the rate we’re going, your children and grandchildren will be totally brainwashed into accepting pro-war Zionist lies and will be signing American bombs that Israel will be dropping on Palestinians in 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, and on and on indefinitely.
Israel has been dropping an average of over 500 bombs per day for nearly 300 days now.
The US media, Democrats and Republicans have normalized state-sponsored mass murder and genocide as a necessary government function to protect Israel, to defend Israel - AND IT’S GOING TO GET WORSE FOR ANY AMERICANS WHO OPPOSE US PROXY WARS AND CALL FOR THE END OF THE OCCUPATION.
Israel is using their powerful illegal foreign lobby group and BIG MONEY to normalize US support of genocide and using the US media to smooth it all over.
I got news for you: the US-backed Occupation of the Palestinian territories will not end until Israel kills and/or expels each and every Palestinian from Gaza.
Israeli and US politicians and the US media will continue to spread their pro-war Zionist lies in your kids classroom, in his or her schoolbooks and from Zionized education systems and administrators.
Netanyahu said it’s not enough to root out Hamas - Netanyahu said Israel must go into the Palestinian classrooms and teach the school children not to hate Israel, not to fight Israel and accept the Occupation and another 75 years of being imprisoned in the world’s largest prison camp and suffer state-sponsored extreme poverty and unemployment for the rest of their lives.
US university administrators are saying virtually the same thing here in America:
They literally want to re-write history books and indoctrinate students into loving Israel, accepting state-sponsored mass murder and Occupation of the Palestinian people.
Zionists are debasing Palestinian people as fast and as hard as they can so when Israel annexes Gaza and the West Bank, Zionists want Americans to accept such US-backed land theft and mass murder as a necessary function against violent, mad Muslims.
ENDING THE US-BACKED ISRAELI WAR ON PALESTINIANS
First of all, let’s get something straight: Israel declared war on Palestinians in June of 1967 and has not ended their war on Palestinians since Israel invaded and occupied Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem 57 years ago.
Zionist Americans and Israelis will tell you that is incorrect, that Israel fully withdrew from Gaza in 2006 and free elections were held.
Yes, Israel dismantled illegal Israeli settlements in Gaza, but Israel never did END ISRAEL’S MILITARY BLOCKADE OF GAZA, by land, sea and air.
According to international law and the Geneva Conventions, a state-sponsored military blockade of a civilian population constitutes a de facto Act of War.
Furthermore, you have never in your lifetime ever heard anyone in the US Ziomedia talk about the legal reality and fact that a civilian population has a legal right to form and maintain armed resistance groups and do enjoy a legal right to use deadly force against an Occupying Power; including what the Geneva Conventions term as, “any means necessary” to evict an illegal Occuping Power.
The Geneva Conventions provide for and authorize a civilian population to import military equipment to defend the civilian population.
In other words, it is perfectly legal for a government to provide arms to a civilian population whether under Occpation or not under state-sponsored occupation.
Israel’s military blockade of Gaza is preventing Palestinians from exercising their legal right to import military equipment into Gaza.
Israel’s military blockade of Gaza is preventing Palestinians from exercising their legal right to defend themselves from the Occupation.
WE NEED A NEW PARTY PRESIDENT TO “GET TOUGH WITH ISRAEL” AND END THE OCCUPATION
What does a new party President “getting tough with Israel” mean?
It means a new party President could enforce international law on Palestinian land.
What does that mean? That means a new President could issue a DEADLINE for Israeli compliance with U.N. Resolution 242; which mandates and orders Israel to fully withdraw from the Palestinian territories, back to Israel’s pre-1967 borders.
A new party President could meet with the Israeli PM and inform them the consequences of Israel failing to comply with U.N. Res. 242 and failing to comply with additional international laws prohibiting the state-sponsored occupation and military blockade of a civilian population.
THE CONSEQUENCES feature a new party President sending US forces to the Palestinian territories and enforcing U.N. Resolution 242 on Palestinian land.
That means US forces dismantling Israeli checkpoints and barriers on Palestinian land and establishing US border control at Israel’s pre-1967 borders.
Pursuant to the War Powers Act, a President can send US forces to act for 60 days at the direction of the President without Congressional authorization.
But first a new party President should meet with the Israeli Prime Minister to try to avoid any military confrontation between US forces and the IDF, by privately and then publicly agreeing to comply with U.N. Res. 242.
Problem is, Netanyahu and Israeli officials have vowed to never, ever comply with U.N. Res. 242 and will never withdraw back to Israel’s pre-1967 borders, under any circumstances.
That’s why a meeting between a new party President and the Israeli PM is so necessary and called for, because a new party President and his Joint Chief of Staffs can sufficiently explain and demonstrate to the Israeli PM the military consequences of the IDF taking any action against US forces on Palestinian land.
THE POINT IS, Israel will never voluntarily END THE OCCUPATION, will never voluntarily comply with U.N. Res. 242 and withdraw back to Israel’s pre-1967 borders, WITHOUT superior military force, or the threat of superior military force being applied against the IDF.
A new party President could explain THE BENEFITS of Israel complying with U.N. Res. 242, such as the U.S. obtaining “security guarantees” from the Palestinians guaranteeing PEACE and the DISBANDMENT OF THE HAMAS GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY FACTIONS, in exchange for sovereign statehood for the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank.
Do you think that is a good idea?
Hamas thought it such a good idea that Hamas ALREADY MADE THAT SPECIFIC OFFER TO THE ISRAELIS, but Netanyahu and Israeli officials refused Hamas’ offer of Peace in exchange for statehood.
Khalil al-Hayya, a high-ranking Hamas official who has represented the Palestinian militant group in negotiations for a cease-fire and hostage exchange deal, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press, in Istanbul, Turkey, Wednesday, April 24, 2024. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra)
Hamas official says group would lay down its weapons if a two-state solution is implemented
By Associated Press Istanbul
PUBLISHED 7:38 AM ET Apr. 25, 2024
A top Hamas political official told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party - if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.
What You Need To Know
A top Hamas political official has told The Associated Press the Islamic militant group is willing to agree to a five-year truce with Israel and that it will lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders
Khalil al-Hayya made the comments Wednesday amid a stalemate in months of cease-fire talks, but it's unlikely Israel would consider such a scenario.
Israel has vowed to crush Hamas following the deadly Oct. 7 attacks that triggered the war in Gaza, and its current government adamantly opposes a two-state solution to the conflict with the Palestinians.
Al-Hayya, who has represented Hamas in negotiations for a cease-fire and hostage exchange deal, spoke in Istanbul, Turkey.
The comments by Khalil al-Hayya in an interview Wednesday came amid a stalemate in months of talks for a cease-fire in Gaza. The suggestion that Hamas would disarm appeared to be a significant concession by the militant group officially committed to Israel's destruction.
But it's unlikely Israel would consider such a scenario. It has vowed to crush Hamas following the deadly Oct. 7 attacks that triggered the war, and its current leadership is adamantly opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state on lands Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war.
Al-Hayya, a high-ranking Hamas official who has represented the Palestinian militants in negotiations for a cease-fire and hostage exchange, struck a sometimes defiant and other times conciliatory tone.
Speaking to the AP in Istanbul, Al-Hayya said Hamas wants to join the Palestine Liberation Organization, headed by the rival Fatah faction, to form a unified government for Gaza and the West Bank.
He said Hamas would accept "a fully sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the return of Palestinian refugees in accordance with the international resolutions," along Israel's pre-1967 borders.
If that happens, he said, the group's military wing would dissolve.
"All the experiences of people who fought against occupiers, when they became independent and obtained their rights and their state, what have these forces done? They have turned into political parties and their defending fighting forces have turned into the national army," he said.
Over the years, Hamas has sometimes moderated its public position with respect to the possibility of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. But its political program still officially "rejects any alternative to the full liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea" — referring to the area reaching from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, which includes lands that now make up Israel.
Al-Hayya did not say whether his apparent embrace of a two-state solution would amount to an end to the Palestinian conflict with Israel or an interim step toward the group's stated goal of destroying Israel.
There was no immediate reaction from Israel or the Palestinian Authority, the internationally recognized self-ruled government that Hamas drove out when it seized Gaza in 2007, a year after winning Palestinian parliamentary elections. After the Hamas takeover of Gaza, the Palestinian Authority was left with administering semi-autonomous pockets of the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
While the international community overwhelmingly supports a two-state solution, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's hard-line government rejects it.
Israel is now preparing for an offensive in the southern city of Rafah, where more than 1 million Palestinians have fled to.
Israel says it has dismantled most of the initial two dozen Hamas battalions since the start of the war, but that the four remaining ones are holed up in Rafah. Israel argues that a Rafah offensive is necessary to achieve victory over Hamas.
Al-Hayya said such an offensive would not succeed in destroying Hamas.
He said contacts between the political leadership outside and military leadership inside Gaza are "uninterrupted" by the war and "contacts, decisions and directions are made in consultation" between the two groups.
Israeli forces "have not destroyed more than 20% of (Hamas') capabilities, neither human nor in the field," he asserted.
"If they can't finish (Hamas) off, what is the solution? The solution is to go to consensus."
In November, a weeklong cease-fire saw the release of more than 100 hostages in exchange for 240 Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. But talks for a longer-term truce and release of the remaining hostages are now frozen, with each side accusing the other of intransigence. Key interlocutor Qatar has said in recent days that it is undertaking a "reassessment" of its role as mediator.
Most of Hamas' top political officials, previously based in Qatar, have left the Gulf country in the past week and traveled to Turkey, where Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh met with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday. Al-Hayya denied a permanent move of the group's main political office is in the works and said Hamas wants to see Qatar continue in its capacity as mediator in the talks.
Israeli and U.S. officials have accused Hamas of not being serious about a deal.
Al-Hayya denied this, saying Hamas has made concessions regarding the number of Palestinian prisoners it wants released in exchange for the remaining Israeli hostages. He said the group does not know exactly how many hostages remain in Gaza and are still alive.
But he said Hamas will not back down from its demands for a permanent cease-fire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops, both of which Israel has balked at.
Israel says it will continue military operations until Hamas is definitively defeated and will retain a security presence in Gaza afterwards.
"If we are not assured the war will end, why would I hand over the prisoners?" the Hamas leader said of the remaining hostages.
Al-Hayya also implicitly threatened that Hamas would attack Israeli or other forces who might be stationed around a floating pier the U.S. is scrambling to build along Gaza's coastline to deliver aid by sea.
"We categorically reject any non-Palestinian presence in Gaza, whether at sea or on land, and we will deal with any military force present in these places, Israeli or otherwise … as an occupying power," he said.
Al-Hayya said Hamas does not regret the Oct. 7 attacks, despite the destruction it has brought down on Gaza and its people. He denied that Hamas militants had targeted civilians during the attacks and said the operation succeeded in its goal of bringing the Palestinian issue back to the world's attention.
And, he said, Israeli attempts to eradicate Hamas would ultimately fail to prevent future Palestinian armed uprisings.
"Let's say that they have destroyed Hamas. Are the Palestinian people gone?" he asked.
This brings us back to the fact that the Biden admin, US State Dept. officials and the US Ziomedia consistently and shamelessly lie to voters and their viewers, never once mentioning the central, core Zionist belief that Gaza and the West Bank belong to Israel and Palestinians are simply squatters living on Israeli land, to be killed or expelled by force as needed.
Biden, Blinken, Bibi and the US media never talk about:
*Hamas 2017 major official policy adjustment from eliminating the State of Israel, “driving Jews into the sea” to an Offer of Peace for Palestinian statehood in Gaza and the West Bank;
*Hamas 2017 Offer of Peace for Palestinian statehood;
*Hamas 2023-2024 reiteration of Hamas Offer of Peace in exchange for statehood.
https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/international/2024/04/25/hamas-official-truce-two-state-solution
*Palestinians’ right to be free of US-backed Israeli occupation;
*Palestinians’ right to legally import and bear arms and fight for Palestinian freedom from US-backed Israeli occupation;
*Palestinians’ legal right to use any means necessary to defend Palestinian lives and Palestinian land;
*US laws prohibiting the transfer of US arms to any government utilizing our weapons in an offensive capacity or in the commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity.
INSTEAD, Biden, Blinken, Bibi and the US media talk non-stop about “Bad Palestinians” versus “Good Palestinians.”
They’re constantly trying to divide the Palestinian people in the minds of voters by issuing this lie: Hey everybody, the “Good Palestinians” hate Hamas and are being bullied by Hamas and they need the US and Israel to help free the “Good Palestinians” from the “Bad Palestinians.”
US and Israeli officials and media try to sell the notion that “Bad Palestinians” won’t give up their armS and give up their fight for freedom from another 75 years of Israeli occupation, while “Good Palestinians” welcome another 75 years of Occupation, Mass Murder and Mass Imprisonment with open arms and flowers. NONSENSE!
And, “We must select a government for the Palestinian people because if we let them hold elections and vote again, they’re probably just going to elect Hamas again, so we must appoint a government or security force over them.”
Of course none of this western claptrap is true.
There are no “Good Palestinians” versus “Bad Palestinians.”
There’s only Palestinians seeking freedom from US-backed Israeli occupation, mass murder and mass imprisonment for another 75 years.
In a perfect world, a sane, rational, peace-loving Israeli government AND PEOPLES would ACCEPT an offer of Peace in exchange for Palestinian statehood.
But unfortunately, such is not the world in which Palestinians and Israelis live.
A majority of Israelis OPPOSE statehood and OPPOSE sending food trucks into Gaza.
A majority of Israelis OPPOSE ENDING THE OCCUPATION and believe every inch of the Palestinian territories belong to Israel and Palestinians are simply subhuman pesks squatting on Israeli land, to be exterminated and/or expelled.
Simply put, Democrats and Republicans are shamelessly lying, grossly misrepresenting, hiding and omitting Israel’s true position, intentions and goals; especially the Zionist dream and plan of GREATER ISRAEL - to expand and annex Muslim land for the State of Israel.
The last time Democrats “got tough with Israel” a bit was when President George Bush Sr. and Sec. of State James Baker told Israelis they need to be willing to trade Peace for the END OF THE OCCUPATION.
You will hear NONE OF THAT TODAY IN 2024.